This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:29, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- No explanation of the subject's notability. Delete unless the article can be expanded to establish notability. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 22:34, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: This was previously tagged for speedy deletion, then reverted for not meeting speedy criteria. Though from what I gather it could be an "A7." -- Gyrofrog (talk) 22:36, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep He's prolific in computer visualistion and VR, see [1]. Authored one book, is a full professor. Dlyons493 23:42, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Dlyons, more notable than a Slate journalist. Kappa 01:41, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, but Dlyons, please add additional info to the article. Crypticfirefly 05:14, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I've added selected publications and the Google Scholar link to the others. Dlyons493 12:08, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep ··gracefool |☺ 07:50, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.