Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beta Tank

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Tank

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Beta Tank (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a small design studio. The refs/external links are all dead or primary. A google search doesn't return anything that would establish notability. Created by a SPA probably as an advert. Desertarun (talk) 13:54, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:00, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:00, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete   many sources are dead links and most of the rest from archive.org. Possibly if all sources work and can be checked, it can be reconsidered, but i vote delete in this format for not meeting significant coverage. Peter303x (talk) 01:29, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete There is not indication in the article of Nobility. A single award In 2010 Beta Tank was awarded Designer of The Future award by Design Miami during the Art Basel. is not going to make it notable. As mentioned in by Peter303x most of the links (even wayback) are dead, so if there is/was something we can't find it. I don't find anything on Google that might make it notable. Jeepday (talk) 18:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:53, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.