Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bierton Strict and Particular Baptists

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move to draft:Bierton Strict and Particular Baptists. If David Clarke can manage to limit the vanity stuff, an article about the church itself may stick. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:27, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bierton Strict and Particular Baptists

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-published book with no secondary coverage; fails WP:NB. Article created by author. Blackguard 02:31, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article is completely unsourced, pointless, and uninformative. Doesn't pass most of Wikipedia's criteria for Notability or Article Quality EoRdE6 (talk) 02:41, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.