Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Brother NZ 2009/2010

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:11, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Big Brother NZ 2009/2010

There is no credible source confirming this edition. I have searched the net and there is still no articles about a New Zealand version of Big Brother. ♪♫Al ucard 16♫♪ 03:47, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a hoax. Idle hands are the devil's tools. Drawn Some (talk) 04:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and per the lack of verifiability. Cunard (talk) 06:42, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per "it ain't happening - it's a WP:HOAX. Nothing in The Herald, only hits on scoop.co.nz are related to the other Big Brother. Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 11:57, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:CRYSTAL at best, WP:HOAX at worst. McWomble (talk) 16:24, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - pure vandalism. At least this AFD isn't suffering from the blatant sockpuppetry that is happening at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Brother New Zealand. dramatic (talk) 19:02, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.
Delete - It is not going to happen. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 01:36, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. C4 doesn't have that much money. plan 8 (talk) 02:34, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Hoax. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 06:26, 21 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.