- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted by User:Panyd under criterion G11. (Non-admin closure) "Pepper" @ 12:50, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Big Dogs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to be a notable company as per WP:CORP. Purely an advertisement, and has been significantly contributed to by editors with WP:COI. Contains WP:PUFFERY and weasel words to make the company appear notable. I agree it exists, but Wikipedia is not a business directory (✉→BWilkins←✎) 10:09, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I've nominated it for a speedy under promotional concerns because well, just look at it. You can't get any more promotional than that unless they were to list coupon codes right on the Wikipedia page. If by some chance it doesn't, I did try to search for sources. There are routine mentions of stores opening/closing/whatnot as well as a large amount of press releases, but not enough in-depth coverage about the company itself to show that it would pass WP:CORP. As Bwilkins put it, the company exists but we're not a directory. This company just isn't notable enough for Wikipedia.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 12:29, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.