Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bikash Narjinary
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -Scottywong| gossip _ 15:13, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Bikash Narjinary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable. Minor soccer player. User-id for creation and editing this article only Dwaipayan (talk) 00:07, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:07, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:08, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:47, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. By clicking the links above, one can tell that he has been mentioned in a few news articles, but the level of coverage doesn't seem to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:BIO. He doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere else. If others find sources, I'm open to revising my decision. Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 22:25, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The existing RS's show trivial mentions, making the article fail WP:GNG. Secret of success (talk) 07:06, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 21:16, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable player who fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 21:17, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.