- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 19:30, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- BillTrack50 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Website/company with no assertion of notability. The references merely state that the site exists. Contributors to the article look to have a serious conflict of interest and have also been spamming the website across multiple Wikipedia article. Wikipedia is better of without this sort of promotional rubbish. Biker Biker (talk) 13:40, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:15, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:15, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:15, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails to meet notability per WP:GNG & WP:ORG.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 16:24, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above and the spam report. This site is now blacklisted. MER-C 11:44, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.