- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Erik9 (talk) 01:47, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Bill Utterback (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article is a recreation, albeit better written, of a previously-deleted article that still fails to meet notability criteria for creative professionals. He seems to have made a good career out of his art, which is commendable, but not notable. Jvr725 (talk) 09:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep a quick gnews search turns up these [1], many of which appear to cover the topic in some detail (hidden behind paywalls for the most part). Hobit (talk) 20:09, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The sources shown by Hobit do seem to indicate notability. --Oakshade (talk) 07:20, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.