Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bimbo transformation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 10:30, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bimbo transformation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable topic, no sources to support more than a dictionary definition Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 20:31, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete- Bunch of original research regarding some bizarre fetish. Reyk _YO! 02:40, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I guess this fetish exists, but doesn't appear to be the subject of study the way, say, foot fetishism has. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:21, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.