- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was REDIRECT due to this article being a duplicate of Binalot. Mo0[talk] 11:34, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article has name of an very obscure company but astrays from the subject. Badly written and void of any encyclopedic value Mecanismo | Talk 22:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep possibly rename and/or expand.Interesting discussion of the use and derivation of binalot in the Philippines. -- JJay 22:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Please cast your vote after you investigate the subject and after you are in a position to base your oppinion on facts. Please read the AFD comment, Binalot Express and Binalot and then rethink your argument --Mecanismo | Talk 23:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- If you knew there was an identical article, why not just redirect? No need for AfD. -- JJay 23:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: this is a duplicate of Binalot. Kappa 23:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Good show. Wish the nom had checked that. Changing my vote to Redirect. Thanks. -- JJay 23:13, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The nom checked that and the nom was aware of that. The nom isn't responsible for JJay casting votes without even reading the AFD or the AFD comment. Please start voting objectively and please stop your petty trollish persecutions on the AFD list. It is starting to be ridiculous --Mecanismo | Talk 12:39, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.