Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bing Bang (Time to Dance)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MelanieN (talk) 00:36, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bing Bang (Time to Dance)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has no sources and it isn't notable. Also, the fact that it said it was #4 on the UK Singles Chart and it became the #1 Christmas single in the UK is most likely false. Alsamrudo (talk) 22:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NMUSIC, as per WP:DEL6/WP:DEL7. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball} 22:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Having ranked on a national music chart (#4 on UK Singles Chart), it passes WP:NSONG. OZ OO 11:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Snaevar (talk) 18:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. Snaevar (talk) 18:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Was definitely 4th on the UK Singles chart.--Snaevar (talk) 18:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Snaevar Can you provide a source that confirms it? Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 07:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boomer Vial: I have an source that confirms it (an newspaper one), but since OZOO allready added one (see the article) why do you need it?--Snaevar (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Snaevar I was unaware that an additional source was added to the article. Apologies about the confusion. I'm still not sure if this article really passes WP:NMUSIC, though. The only one of the three stipulation it passes is the one that has this note, "Note again that this indicates only that a song may be notable, not that it is notable". Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 03:30, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I added two statements to the article, with one source each.--Snaevar (talk) 17:45, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Yeah, I feel like it's somewhat important enough for its own page. The music chart thing helps. Paintspot (talk) 13:42, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.