- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 04:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Failed both {{db-ad}} and {{prod}}, but article reads like an advertisement, and significance of the product is in doubt. Poorly sourced: of the references provided, most are links to other Wikipedia articles with no mention of the product. The others seem promotional in nature. Only 131 Google hits. -- MisterHand (Talk to the Hand|Contribs) 15:48, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete No independent sources establishing the notability of this product, even specialized websites make little or no mention of this product -- Cenarium (talk) 16:31, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Why it didn't die from {{db-ad}} is beyond me, but at this point, it fails to assert notability. If this article does somehow make it through AfD, please note that the Row2k link is nothing more than a press release from the manufacturer, and the Head of the Ohio website doesn't mention the boat at all. --DachannienTalkContrib 08:41, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Google turns up no reliable sources. Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 01:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.