- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Owen× ☎ 22:51, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
this is not really a stub too small
- This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:37, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The answer to a substub is to expand it, not to delete an article on a verifiable video game by a notable publisher. I'm just off to do that now, in fact... — Haeleth Talk 16:30, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- And it's done. Can we keep this speedily, since the nomination doesn't actually explain why the page should have been deleted, and the complaint no longer applies in any case? — Haeleth Talk 16:41, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep, notable and stubbed. Gerrit CUTEDH 16:53, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Fixed it up a bit. I can add an image as soon as the stupid image server comes online.--Ewok Slayer 16:55, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep acceptable in its present form. Durova 17:17, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, as notable. Carioca 22:57, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Weakish Keep- I was a mad gamer back in the early 90s and I have never heard of Bio Menace, so It must be fairly obscure. Reyk 23:25, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I used to love this oldie. Haoie 07:09, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.