Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biotech Express

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete by Jimfbleak under G11 (non-admin closure) Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:39, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Biotech Express

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable per WP:BK, only mentions found are sales Deunanknute (talk) 18:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete: promotional. ubiquity (talk) 18:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as highly promotional. APerson (talk!) 19:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It's just an advertisement for a non-notable magazine. ChemNerd (talk) 00:47, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete -G11 & A7. Creator has already been blocked for WP:PROMOTION, why is the spam article still up in our mainspace? Tagging it for G11. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 00:04, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.