Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bispectral index

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Dismissed. Content dispute. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-07 04:34Z

Bispectral_index (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

This article is blatant advertising. BIS did not reduce the incidence of awareness in a large controlled trial. Consequently, this technology is not generally accepted as measuring the depth of anaesthesia. http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/full/100/4/1221 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bezzera (talk • contribs) 2007/03/01 11:36:40

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep. This is a content dispute, not to be resolved via deletion. Spacepotato 03:51, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• weak keep There seem to be references, though they are almost invisible. The treatment seems unbalanced, but that can be remedied.DGG 04:20, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless far better refed. Most of the material here reads like advsertising. NBeale 16:16, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.