Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BitMart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 21:55, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BitMart

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

BitMart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the sources used as refs appear to be from crypto-related sites instead of reliable sources. The only reliable sources are WP:TECHCRUNCH and a CNBC ranking of the top 200 fintech companies, neither of which seem like enough to meet GNG. A WP:BEFORE also turns up mostly cryptospam. BuySomeApples (talk) 22:02, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Companies. BuySomeApples (talk) 22:02, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: More crypto spam, sourcing is iffy, I can only find PR items or crypto blogs. Nothing for notability, appears PROMO. Oaktree b (talk) 23:33, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:50, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and Oaktree b. Andre🚐 02:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Sources from cryptocurrency websites would not be considered reliable. We haven't found significant coverage of this topic in reputable, independent news sources as outlined in WP:SIGCOV. Gedaali (talk) 20:31, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.