Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitraser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE due to lack of participation. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:44, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bitraser

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article cites two sources, one is a recycled press release and the other is nugatory. There is no evidence of the significance of this product. Guy (Help!) 19:48, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Though this product is relatively new in the market, so source of evidence require some time to put on the page. Also what other kinds of evidence require to prove notability? Please suggest so I can find some of those. Amitpandey21 19:48, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a guide to Wikipedia:Notability. Jonpatterns (talk) 08:46, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More inclined to delete as my searches (News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found nothing significant aside from some links at News. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:26, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have added few more references to make authenticity of this page, please review & suggest. Amitpandey21 11:55, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:59, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.