- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 21:09, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Bitucus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This seems to be a complete hoax. Redtigerxyz Talk 13:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Redtigerxyz Talk 14:02, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Redtigerxyz Talk 14:05, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Quickly delete. Blatant hoaxes like this can be just prodded, right? Shreevatsa (talk) 15:19, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as hoax. "Biticus hindu" and "biticus shiva" result in zero Google hits. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 16:49, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I was going to add a warning tag to the creator's talk page, but I skipped it because s/he created it back in March 2006 and hasn't been on Wikipedia since. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 16:50, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete G3. It is a hoax and deserves to get out soon. -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes 18:38, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.