- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was dealt with as copyvio. - Mailer Diablo 08:57, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. --Mysidia (talk) 17:08, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks like copyvio of [1] and [2] anyway. Waterguy 17:28, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Then please follow the procedure in Wikipedia:Copyright problems. Always look to apply Copyright Judo to corporate blurbs and advertisements. Uncle G 17:47, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, it seems obvious that the article in question is a copyvio, then. Perhaps this article is really a speedy candidate now? Marked as CV. --Mysidia (talk) 17:07, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Biztalk Server is a real Microsoft product which I am sure meets the criterion of notability. Content to be changed if copyvio -Ravikiran 18:09, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This product warrants an article, albeit a much more wikified and encyclopaedic one. Remy B 15:17, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Afd is not just about whether a subject merits an article, it's about whether this content is useful, and it's not.. it's just an advertising spew.. should be deleted.. --Mysidia (talk) 16:56, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Umm. Problem solved. Just put a redirect to Microsoft BizTalk Server -- Ravikiran 15:24, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.