Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blacksun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jamie^☆S93 17:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blacksun

Non-notable ISP, article is heavy on COI, and reads like an advertisement Wuhwuzdat (talk) 17:02, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think that the incident described here: [1] (Where BlackSun is mentioned by name) does assert notability of the company. While the article might seem slightly POV, it is notable, in my opinion and the prose can easily be edited to neutrality. The Dominator^Talk_Edits 17:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That article gives a mention only, one mention is far below the standard for notability. Hairhorn (talk) 18:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:43, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:44, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:44, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing in the article shows notability. The "recent news" section is not even about Blacksun. Thryduulf (talk) 18:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. An article mentioning they are complaining about a bid process isn't notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 21:14, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:N. feydey (talk) 10:00, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.