Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blade: Dictionary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 01:47, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blade: Dictionary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

WP:NOT. WP:ATT. The most important terms could be mentioned in Blade: The Series, because it is relatively small, but Wikipedia articles aren't fan glossaries. Saikokira 03:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Per nom. Fails WP:NOT.--Bryson^{{Talk}{Edits}} 03:12, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It's hard to me to imagine how this could be supported by reliable sources. -FisherQueen (Talk) 13:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:NOT, content more appropriate for a Blade wiki. Flyguy649^talk_contribs 15:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with article Blade: The Series. -UniReb (Talk) 18:34, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, least of all a cruft dictionary. Stifle (talk) 17:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOT. Doczilla 20:58, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wreaks of cruft. Goodnightmush^Talk 21:27, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.