Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blaize Clement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:00, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blaize Clement

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Subject does not meet WP:AUTHOR. The article itself lacks reliable sources. Chris Troutman (talk) 04:00, 24 January 2014 (UTC)~~[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:13, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:13, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:AUTHOR #3. Her books have significant review coverage in trade magazines. For example Curiosity Killed the Cat Sitter is reviewed in Publishers Weekly, Kirkus, Booklist and Library Journal.[1] Duplicity Dogged the Dachshund reviewed in PW, Kirkus, Booklist.[2] Even Cat Sitters Get the Blues in PW and Kirkus.[3] Cat Sitter on a Hot Tin Roof in Kirkus, LJ, Booklist.[4] It goes on for her other books.. There are other reviews such as Anipal Times, Richmond Times-Dispatch. There are a couple obituaries: Herald-Tribune, Mystery Scene Magazine. Some additional GNG material: Sun-Sentinel -- GreenC 05:44, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:25, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per the links provided by User:Green Cardamom, the subject passes criteria #3 of WP:AUTHOR, with the subject's works having received "...multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In light of the other material found, I'll withdraw my nomination for deletion. This article needs serious work and hope this new material is added. Anyone is welcome to close this discussion. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The nominator has withdrawn the nomination. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.