Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlankApplication (software)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 02:16, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- BlankApplication (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable software product. Was unable to find any significant coverage. Haakon (talk) 14:00, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Note that this describes itself as a free-software content management system written in Ruby by thinkDRY as a Ruby on Rails web application. Your guess is as good as mine. It also contains the happy thought that BlankApplication is extendable using extensions, but the page seems to be more a basic doc page than an encyclopedia article. Google News, Books, and Scholar haven't heard of it, either with the (software) extension of the title or without. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:31, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find signifiant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 20:41, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I too cannot locate significant coverage of this product. JBsupreme (talk) 22:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.