Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blank Label Comics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 08:17, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blank Label Comics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This now defunct collective of webcomics was always less notable than the individual webcomics that it was made of. The collective itself (rather than the member comics acting independently) seems not to have done much to pass WP:42. LukeSurl^{t c} 09:59, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Google Books suggests the term may be mentioned in few works; discounting printed Wikipedia spamforks, search for "Blank Label Comics" still suggests a dozen or so sources to review. The mention may be simply passing, but nonetheless I'd like to see somebody check at least T. Campbell (2006). A History of Web Comics, V 1.0: The Golden Age: 1993-2005. Antarctic Press. ISBN 978-0-9768043-9-0. Retrieved 24 June 2013. . --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:55, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 00:13, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:31, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per nom. Association composed of notable elements. Seems worth including for posterity. How would deleting it improve the encyclopedia? Candleabracadabra (talk) 16:45, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Since http://www.blanklabelcomics.com/ went down the content of this article is effectively non-verifiable. --LukeSurl^{t c} 17:13, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The webcomics are notable, not this label. --Novil Ariandis (talk) 18:07, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.