- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:21, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Bleeding Apple (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The organisation has a lack of notability and reliable sources to prove any. The evacipated (talk) 05:30, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I performed a search and while I could find brief, trivial mentions of this film collective in passing, I found no actual coverage of the group itself. What little mention it has received has been in relation to the people involved in it. None of these articles were actually about the film collective or about the artist's involvement in the group, but their individual achievements. Notability is not inherited by the group being associated with notable persons. None of the awards listed on the page were actually given to the group, but rather to the individual persons involved for projects that were done while they were members of the group but not made as a group project. The editor's comments on the talk page argued for inherited notability, but saying that the individual achievements for the members translates into group notability is akin to saying that because every member of the group were members of the Guelph rec center, that the rec center merits an entry. That's just not how it works.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:16, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I concur with Tokyogirl79's analysis. Neither the collective itself, nor its works as a collective have been covered. -- Whpq (talk) 15:32, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.