- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 01:39, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Blinkbox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Tagged and defended under speedy CSD A7 - notability not indicated. This is a procedural nomination so as to seek wider input. I offer no indication as to keep or delete. --VS talk 12:35, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I speedied it, and think it still stand up. No assertion of notability, keeping it simply because Joost is kept is a nonsense argument. Any software that does the same thing does not automatically need an article here. --Ged UK (talk) 12:40, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notability can be referenced from Google hits - stories from the Guardian, Timesonline, techcrunch etc etc.--Londonclanger (talk) 13:01, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. There are easily a half dozen articles in gNews to support claims to notability under criteria 1 of WP:WEB. Of course, they need to be added to the article. LinguistAtLarge 15:18, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I've actually heard of these guys (and I'm not in the UK). Several mentions in notable media sources seems sufficient to me. Chasingsol (talk) 16:31, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Articles on Google News [1] actually discuss how they signed major deals which goes well beyond any sort of press release that would be considered unsuitable as a source. - Mgm|(talk) 16:46, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- keep. i've started to reference the article based on the two guardian sources. pretty sure newteevee.com doesn't count as RS. if anyone could help reference all the information or add any more of the sources mentioned in the gnews search it would be great. thanks Jessi1989 (talk) 17:20, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the existence of multiple reliable sources that establish notability. Wiw8 (talk) 16:51, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.