Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Block McCloud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Army of the Pharaohs. Black Kite (talk) 21:48, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Block McCloud

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject fails WP:MUSICBIO. The subject lacks significant independent coverage in reliable sources. The only coverage in reliable sources he has received has been a part of the group Army of the Pharaohs and notability is not inherited from the group. A redirect to the group would be proper. STATic message me! 19:03, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 00:24, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah man I'm not even going to argue with this. If I may, I can try adding more significant coverage on the artists solo career; e.g. more info on his releases if that will help.. or would I be wasting my time? TwinTurbo (talk) 16:38, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of in-depth reviews in professionally editing news magazines are what the article needs. If you find them, ping my talk page and I'll reverse my !vote. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:26, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@TwinTurbo: That would be reviews/profiles of him or his solo albums, not articles about the group or their works. I do not see a significant notability of him as a solo artist to warrant the separate article. STATic message me! 05:18, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking reliable sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:26, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 21:10, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Content
Added information from a source (The Pulse Magazine), early history of Block McCloud, and more information on his studio album The Four Walls. http://www.thepulsemag.com/wordpress/2012/09/10-12-block-mccloud
Also added this link, on more information about his ventures plus personal topics related to Block McCloud. TwinTurbo (talk) 09:25, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And also are these links acceptable: http://urbankingsinc.com/now/psycho-realm/block-mccloud-of-gods-of-chaos-exclusive-interview

Keep status yet?: By the changes and improvements I have currently made on the page, does this make it more suitable for Wikipedia standards? TwinTurbo (talk) 12:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Two of those are interviews, which are primary sources and not independent of the subject, alas. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:00, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And the third one? TwinTurbo (talk) 09:03, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:24, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Judging from the new content I have added to the page surely do make the article good enough to keep. TwinTurbo (talk) 20:48, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.