- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:56, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NN. — WCityMike (T | C) ⇓ plz reply HERE (why?) ⇓ 03:58, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. DarthVader 05:35, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable. --Terence Ong 06:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:WEB - Motor (talk) 10:32, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete someone is trying to use wikipedia to up their google rankings. --Bachrach44 13:12, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Royalbroil 13:57, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Then maybe create a redirect to blogosphere to discourage recreation. — Haeleth Talk 17:15, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect per Heeleth. -- saberwyn 01:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Zero sharp 06:59, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Royalbroil: Advertisement, vanity, useless web-link, not notable, fails WP:WEB, then Redirect per Haeleth's suggestion. Ande B. 07:04, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect per Heeleth. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:53, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.