- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Dakota 16:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
neologism Skrewler 09:12, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - indeed a neologism, and not a very popular one, so delete per WP:NEO. Jayden54 09:58, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete neologism... if not at least transwiki to wiktionary where this sorta crap belongs. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 10:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all blogging neologisms. Guy (Help!) 11:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. James086Talk | Contribs 12:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - made-up word, supposed meaning is unclear. - Femmina 12:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn, neologism. Eusebeus 12:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Made-up by some guy, nothing special, not notable. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 16:15, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, unreferenced and if this is a real term it does not seem to be a notable one Dragomiloff 01:28, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If only Wikipedia was a paper encyclopedia because then we could burn this. The Mirror of the Sea 01:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Anomo 22:02, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.