Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood Sweat and Wars (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:41, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blood Sweat and Wars

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable unreleased film, per WP:NFF, film has not had a notable production, and there is no evidence that will have an imminent release BOVINEBOY2008 09:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:50, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Donaldd23 (talk) 22:41, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per nom, WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL. I am somewhat intrigued that the previous AfD closed as "keep". As the majority of the coverage which was relied upon for the "keep" arguments were based on what appear to be trivial passing mentions ([1][2][3][4]), ROTM industry coverage of production activity ([5]) and local coverage of the producers' failed(?) attempts to find funding to complete the project ([6]). The latter, apparently, being primarily what the subject is notable for. I would note that there is some local coverage of this type also relating to the questions being raised about the project ever being completed. And the reasons for that. But I wonder whether this type of coverage is more down to the promoter's marketing skills, than to any actual/inherent notability. In any event, I don't see how the WP:CRYSTAL or WP:NFILM guidelines provider for articles on otherwise ROTM unfinished and unreleased films... Guliolopez (talk) 09:05, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the film is not yet notable and largely hypothetical. --Paul Carpenter (talk) 09:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above Spiderone 15:36, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.