- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:25, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Blu (Software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
no assertion of notability Ironholds (talk) 19:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as claimed, not notable and not claimed to be notable, and not referenced to sources that show notability. Miami33139 (talk) 00:10, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The Twitter Account of Blu is followed by more than 1500 users worldwide (that means at least that much user uses this). This figure is quite good than most of the other Twitter clients - so if they have no problem having a place in wiki, why should we remove this one? And as of Notability, just think about it guys, how many users use Mozilla Fennec or Google Android in comparison of Opera Mini or Symbian? Does that number make the product to be termed as NOT-NOTABLE !!! – Deb ‖ Poke • EditList ‖ 07:49, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- None of that is evidence of notability. I have explained to you twice before - the article needs to pass WP:N. Ironholds (talk) 09:17, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per previous comments. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 15:20, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.