- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh 03:00, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does not pass notability. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for spam. Avi (talk) 06:28, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, I honestly don't see how this is spam. Also, many companies aren't notable and yet they have articles on Wikipedia. --Salona (talk) 06:30, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No indicators of notability from independent sources. The company/brand are less than a year old so this is unsurprising. --Dhartung | Talk 07:23, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per comments by Dhartung. Mh29255 (talk) 08:19, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per nom MiracleMat (talk) 09:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I couldn't find any third-party coverages other than recruitment advertising. Perhaps there have been references to it in trade publications for the grocery or beverage industries in Pakistan, but I have not found any. --Eastmain (talk) 11:21, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not a shopping guide. --Wtshymanski (talk) 21:39, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.