Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Fin Black Disciples

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Black Disciples#History and Organizational Structure. MBisanz ^talk 01:41, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Fin Black Disciples

Lack of notability. The article depends on a single source which probably doesn't even qualify as a WP:RS. No NPOV coverage. No mention of anything notable except their existence. Appears to be local interest only. Probably qualifies for speedy delete. Niteshift36 (talk) 12:40, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or redirect to Black Disciples. Doesn't qualify as a speedy, but there isn't enough notability for it to stand on its on. Google news shows a few passing mentions at best, and a Google web search turns up a load of non-reliable blogs/self-published sites. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 13:35, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. The two sentences can easily be merged into Black Disciples#History and Organizational Structure, which already mentions the Blue Fins (though doesn't link to this particular article) Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 16:49, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If there were ample sources to support a merge (or a keep) I would be all in favor of it, but I'm seeing nothing of a reliable nature as per WP:RS guidelines. JBsupreme (talk) 04:48, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- raven1977 (talk) 20:03, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chicago-related deletion discussions. -- raven1977 (talk) 20:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Clearly meets the criteria for speedy deletion, A7-group. Article does not state the importance/notability of the organization, and fails to establish reliable sourcing.-Andrew c ^[talk]
Speedy delete CSD A7 applies as the article does not state why this organization is notable or important, nor does it provide any type of referencing material for the reader to figure it out on their own. coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 22:51, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.