Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Jay Project
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Article was blanked by creator/sole author and moved to his user page. MfD may be appropriate.. The Bushranger One ping only 23:22, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Blue Jay Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability. Article creator acknowledges here that it is his own personal hobby OS. Google News returns no hits. Vanadus (talk | contribs) 02:57, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Original research, no reliable sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris1066 (talk • contribs) 03:00, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. WP:OR and self promotion. — Abhishek Talk 03:04, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, the Google code page says 'we now have a Wikipedia article'. WP:COI. I typically expect more from a Google search. Matthew Thompson talk to me bro! 03:31, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 15:27, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.