Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BoBo Fishball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 08:05, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BoBo Fishball (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of BoBo Fish Ball which was WP:SOFTDELETEd at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BoBo Fish Ball. Still no indication of notability, the page is not written in a neutral tone, and the creator's only edits have been creating this page and related pages and adding links to it to other pages. Nathan2055talk - contribs 23:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:05, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:05, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It's possible that a sufficiently dedicated editor could construct an article for parent company Ha Li Fa, but the specific BoBo brand does not merit its own article. The brand's social media got a bit of attention in 2017 for a video series advertising its products, and routine coverage (quotes, stats) about the brand in China shows up here and there, but that's about it, so WP:NCORP does not appear to be met. Bakazaka (talk) 09:12, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this promotional, unsourced text, per nomination. (Which has been, incidentally, created by an account that was involved in just two articles, both about retail enterprises, in ten tears' time.) It's possible that this fishball needs a bit of salt, as well. -The Gnome (talk) 13:24, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.