Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobby Barr (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Barr

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still fails WP:ATHLETE as has not played in a fully professional league. G4 doesn't apply for the previous discussions as he's played for some clubs now, but not the right ones. Ged UK 14:25, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:08, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nominators sums it up nicely. This guy is not notable. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:20, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~Speedy~~ Delete Recreation of previous material with some additional irrelevancy thrown in. Stu.W UK (talk) 05:07, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: User:Ged UK (the nominator) declined a G4 on this, and explained the reasoning pretty well on my talk page. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 06:00, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL, and this constant deletion and re-creation is just a waste of everyone's time. Giant Snowman 15:36, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not meet either WP:NFOOTY or WP:GNG criteria for inclusion. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 15:14, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.