Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boeing 747/Image Gallery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Not an Article  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:58, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Boeing 747/Image Gallery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This orphaned article (only link is to Boeing 747) has no potential for expansion. It is just a collection of pictures. I believe that is what the Commons are for (a link is provided in the 747 article to an array of 747-related images). Furthermore, there are already plenty of images in the 747 article itself. I therefore see no useful purpose for this redundant article. Airplaneman ✈ 22:18, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A3, as this article has no content other than an image galley. I tagged the article accordingly. It looks like there were attempts in the past to transwiki the page to Commons, but there is already a Boeing 747 page there. –Grondemar 22:24, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note I'm not calling for any of the contained images to be deleted, just the article. –Grondemar 22:25, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Photos are fine and might be of some use, but this just isn't an article -- Boing! said Zebedee 22:47, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• This should be a category (here or at Commons, not a page. Speedy delete - The Bushranger (talk) 22:57, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.