Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bogan - Locations Context
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cbrown1023 talk 19:16, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Bogan - Locations Context (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
All the information in this article now exists in Bogan (disambiguation) Asher196 (talk) 05:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete These articles have titles that no one will search for (Bogan - Family Name Context). I reversed the page move of Bogan to the extremely unwieldy 'bogan' - Australian / New Zealand context. The editor who created the articles seems to have done so based on an objection that "Bogan" as a family name or place name was subordinated as a disambiguation page to the Australian pejorative term, and that the capitalisation of the article title implied it was a proper noun, hence the 'quote marks'. As it stands, the items covered on these new disambiguation pages are mostly redlinks, and as the nominator states, all material is covered by Bogan (disambiguation). --Canley (talk) 07:01, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:10, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- strong delete ... and when you try to wikify this editor's collection of redlinks by putting where it belongs, he reverts you. Obviously not worth saving. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 14:18, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- comment, in fact, Shadrack Bogan should be put up for AfD for non-notability. Wikipedia is not a genealogy blog. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 14:20, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- So nominated. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 15:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no reason for this oddly-named page to exist when all of the information has been moved to the proper article. So Awesome (talk) 15:21, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Bogan (disambiguation) and then speedy delete per WP:CSD#R3, an implausible misnomer. Or just save a step and delete now. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:01, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.