Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boho Interactive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 01:26, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Boho Interactive

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Boho Interactive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails GNG. I only found a few minor mentions and two news stories on an event they organised. not enough to meet the notability criteria. TryKid ^{[dubious – discuss]} 18:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Theatre, Companies, and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 18:53, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Its website says that it is " a collective of Australian artists and game designers", but no notable people are involved. Only one inaccessible article is cited (what does it say?). The website continues: "We create interactive performances and games". Unless we see WP:Reliable sources writing about them, they do not satisfy the notability criteria. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:28, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I've added references, including a profile of the company in New Scientist (2016) and updated the list of projects and collaborating partners. Not sure, but maybe this addresses the notability concerns? Ebb3030 (talk) 14:07, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You only added one source, and in that article, Boho is just one of the companies mentioned. I'm still a *Delete*. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:54, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair. I've added additional references and citations, including to HuffPostUK, the Sydney Morning Herald, UCL Culture blogs and an abstract for a research paper about the company presented at the European Geophysicists Union. See what you think. Ebb3030 (talk) 22:22, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I found https://www.begadistrictnews.com.au/story/7753307/disaster-preparedness-youth-group-program-kicks-off-with-boho-interactive-session-in-eden/ but it's not enough. Not your siblings' deletionist (talk) 21:30, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Added references to more reliable sources writing about Boho including New Scientist. Ebb3030 (talk) 14:19, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.