Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boo D. Licious

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:27, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hardly notable. Aside from the fact that her name is a play on words from a Destiny Child song, this performer has not made enough movies to be even considered notable and has no other claims to notability to speak of. Thus Delete. Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 03:33, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, not sufficiently notable. Royboycrashfan 03:51, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per well argued nomination. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 22:51, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. The IMDB link lists a whole bunch of videos she's been in, way more than enough for any normal actor to be notable. It's possible that every one of those videos is such a tiny niche thing that they don't add up to notability, but it seems more likely that this person really is a notable porn actor. --Allen 22:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Porn actors can make a movie a week, so imdb count isn't really the best benchmark, doesn't seem to have won any awards for her eh... "performances". Eivind 00:31, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep As a fine example of early 21 century Reality porn. Garnier 22:00, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: The article in question does not assert this alleged fact. Care to cite a verifiable source? -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 03:53, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep.--Kross^Talk 21:02, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment from closing admin: Quantity of videos is seldom a measurement for notability when it comes to porn. I mean really. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:27, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.