- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 04:05, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- BookPage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Fails WP:WEB. Schuym1 (talk) 19:46, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete As the article is about a company that provides a number of information services, both in print and over the web, I'd say WP:ORG is the more appropriate standard. I don't, however, see any non-trivial reliable sources about this service. I see a lot (and I mean _a lot_) of libraries stating that they're subscribers and offering their readers advice on how to use the service, but I'd class such articles as trivial. I'd change my mind if just one independent source with substantial information about the service is found. It sounds like it _should_ be notable. JulesH (talk) 21:46, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:WEB. No reliable sources found. --MaNeMeBasat (talk) 15:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.