- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Convert to disambig by User:Vicarious per consensus. PeaceNT 15:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article is a glorified dicdef, it might need to be replaced with a disambig page afterwards (including a link to wiktionary), it's current content needs to go. Vicarious 02:37, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- borderline clenaup. needs to e completely rewritten. SYSS Mouse 02:42, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete The slang applications in the third paragraph and the "see also" provide a bare minimum of notability, but for me, WP:WINAD wins the day. YechielMan 02:59, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- redirect to Treasure? Seems like the same basic concept. --W.marsh 03:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Nah, after this is decided I'll make the page into a disambig page for booty call (slang and movie), bootylicious, treasure, wiktionary link, etc. I just wanted consensus before I trashed the current content. Vicarious 03:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, dab away then. We need a better process for this than using an AfD to establish consensus... happened just yesterday with the article Tomorrow (paging Abbott and Costello...) --W.marsh 14:45, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Nah, after this is decided I'll make the page into a disambig page for booty call (slang and movie), bootylicious, treasure, wiktionary link, etc. I just wanted consensus before I trashed the current content. Vicarious 03:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Convert to disambig per nom. From a look at the sparse edit history, I doubt anyone would have cared if you just boldly did it without all this. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 04:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Convert to disambig as suggested. You may withdraw your nomination and be bold. --Dhartung | Talk 05:00, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Convert to disambig, which I guess has already been pretty thoroughly agreed upon, but here I am to pile on anyway. -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Convert to disambig given my experience creating Dime (slang), I believe this article could be improved into an article, but for now a disambig is appropriate. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 23:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, it's been done, this afd can be closed now. Vicarious 02:17, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.