This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. ~~ N (t/c) 19:00, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
Pure advertisement and openly vanity. No encyclopedic content, no evidence of notability. Delete. -- Antaeus Feldspar 03:10, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete advertising. A little low on Google hits (only 1,840), and the site's Alexa rank >170,000. Jaxl | talk 03:52, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Advert, vanity, NN. MCB 06:00, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, blatantly non-encyclopedic vanity. - Mgm|(talk) 08:17, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity spam. Jobe6
13:06, September 5, 2005 (UTC) - Delete spam. Mindmatrix 14:36, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Spam. Amren (talk) 16:39, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Spam -- WB 21:33, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - advertising a non-notable web site. Rob Church Talk | Desk 23:09, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
.svg){kind=small}
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.