Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borrowed Buffy plots

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete (10d/1k/2m/2mod)  RasputinAXP  c 18:40, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Buffycruft, any relevant info could be put on the Buffy page. Jersey Devil 05:13, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, WP:CRUFT. --Terence Ong 05:18, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, there are plenty of more relevant Buffy articles for each of these factoids. Melchoir 07:51, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --MaNeMeBasat 09:45, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Retain - could be of interest to writers and critics (TV and literary) and enhances understanding of the fantasy genre and its relationships with classical fiction Gpscholar 11:15, 20 May 2006 (UTC) gpscholar[reply]
• Delete, personal observations. Dr Zak 13:12, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge any relevant info to Buffy and delete.--Jusjih 14:38, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. -- Kicking222 14:53, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gpscholar (talk • contribs)
  • It should be noted that Gpscholar already expressed a preference to keep a few lines above this. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 19:09, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• He's also the creator, and sole contributor to the article. --TM 20:54, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as cruft, OR. --TM 20:54, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Buffy cruft and original research. Pegasus1138^{Talk | Contribs | Email} ---- 21:54, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fancruft Lankiveil 23:39, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge or delete - should be a section of another Buffy article, not a standalone article. I'm not sure about the OR question, which would swing the balance between merge and delete. It does appear to have been well-researched and the concept of borrowing or paying homage is certainly not new or unique to Buffy. Paddles 15:14, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge anything passing WP:FICT that isn't already covered by Melchoir's comment, or just delete. I agree with Paddles' last comment. And all Buffista fancruft sites fail to meet WP:RS. Barno 01:27, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge The literary and pop-cultural references and homages of a popular television series is a fine topics, but the information really should go in a) the main Buffy the Vampire Slayer article, or b) the individual episodes' articles. - CNichols 21:09, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - very good article -- better than most other buffy articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.49.221.35 (talk • contribs) Could this be User:Gpscholar?

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.