Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BortnerAnimation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 12:56, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• OK, guys, I can kind of understand why you would say that this site isn't very notable, but about the spamming thing: My two brothers and I are really sorry about that. Our site was in it's awkward developing stage, which is when we didn't really get this sort of thing. We had a lot of stupid ideas, which we deleted, but we don't even know WHY we did that spamming thing, especially on the H*R Wiki. We really like Homestar Runner. We went to the deletion logs and read what we had typed and were like, "Wow, I can't believe we wrote something like that." That's the only thing in our history that we are ashamed of doing. Again, we're sorry and hopefully you can forgive us for that. --ZAF 15:52, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• www.bortneranimation.com seems a non-notable website. --Mysidia (talk) 01:44, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable self-promotion / site-promotion. Seems like this site has been advertised and subsequently deleted before (see last December's deletion log here and use your browser's find command), and I'm sure I remember some spam somewhere else. --Qirex 05:50, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not nearly notable enough. but i must admit, I laughed. -- Malo 07:37, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It's funny, it's topical, it's well done, but still makes no claim to notability. --A D Monroe III 15:15, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not notable --Rogerd 03:27, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not notable/encyclopediac Prashanthns 17:46, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Prashanthns. Johntex\^talk 23:58, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.