- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jamie☆S93 00:06, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- BossInGame (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:WEB, WP:V, and WP:RS: non-notable game with no references based on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Wyatt Riot (talk) 03:26, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not much else to add. Seems to fail the basic inclusion criteria spelled out at WP:N. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:11, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:00, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 12:49, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Pretty much per nom. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 13:02, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can't see any claim of importance, so my first thought was "Speedy A7" (as "web content"). However, as a speedy has already been declined we'll let this run it's course. Marasmusine (talk) 14:18, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.