- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as an attack page. cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. Completely uncited neologism/original-research/jargon kind of thing. Perhaps it's a valid jargon term, in which case redirecting to...um...dunno-where, it certainly reasonable, but the page as it stands is not up to par. PROD tag was removed but nothing was actually fixed. And from the talk page it now appears one intent of the page's creator is to be a blog or chat more than an encyclopedia page, which WP is not. DMacks 13:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete POV essay not an encyclopaedia article. If you want to slag off your boss, get a blog. --Folantin 14:13, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as racist attack page. Read the end: "One similarity of boss monkeys have is that a substantial amount are from third world countries [...] In time this usually results in [lawsuits etc or] good old fashioned primate-beating violence." Sorry, but referring to people from "third world countries" as "monkeys" is completely unacceptable. — Haeleth Talk 14:15, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Speedy delete as this meets {{db-atk}} in all respects: It is a page created primarily to disparage its subject . ("Solely| rather than "primarily" in this case), even without the racism. So tagged and author warned. Tonywalton | Talk 14:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.