Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boston Virtual ARTCC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fails WP:GNG. Less Unless (talk) 21:03, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Boston Virtual ARTCC

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Boston Virtual ARTCC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, a quick google search shows no notable mentions in any reliable sources. Most citations in the article are just citing the organization itself or other related groups (i.e. VATSIM, etc). Kb03 (talk) 22:50, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete most these virtual world hobby websites are rarely of note and nothing seen that shows this one is notable enough for a stand-alone article. MilborneOne (talk) 12:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fails WP:GNG. RecycledPixels (talk) 15:46, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. If there are any high-quality references for this organisation, they're buried further down the google than I could find. RomanSpa (talk) 11:56, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.