- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Bucketsofg 21:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Bound Together (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable fan album, with no evidence of coverage in reliable sources. Unlike the articles under discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relics of the Chozo, this is not an official project of OverClocked ReMix (hence the separate listing). In addition, the vast majority of this article consists of unverifiable gossip column-type material about the contributors. WarpstarRider 03:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 21:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. --RaiderAspect 04:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Edeans 04:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't appear to satisfy the notability guidelines for music. No reliable sources, just primary information and download stats. Leebo86 04:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep A fascinating story about a community endeavour, but if it is incapable of verification or appropriate referencing through being something of an "inside story", it belongs on a web page, not an encyclopaedia. Orderinchaos78 07:09, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails notability requirements by WP:MUSIC; most of the article's information is unverifiable. - Chardish 13:20, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete While I applaud the communal effort, the problem remains of WP:V and 3rd party coverage. Under WP:MUSIC this wouldn't fly. SkierRMH 21:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The subject is interesting - but interesting does not equal notable. Chairman S. Talk Contribs 23:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.