Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bovasial contex driven neural response

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. It's not really funny enough to be worth going to the effort of BJAODN-while-still-complying-with-GFDL. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 08:26, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article appears to be a complete hoax, filled with an incomprehensible mix of technical jargon from biology. All Google entries for this "Bovasial contex driven neural response" are just copies of this hoax article on Wikipedia. I highly recommend we delete this article, and ideally, even speedying it (should that be warranted). I should also mention that I am beyond embarassed that I inadvertantly played a role in keeping this article - a user attempted to move this to WP:BJAODN, and at the time, I incorrectly interpreted this as vandalism! For those who have read this, let's make this a good reminder that we need to read the article too instead of skipping straight to vandalism control - sometimes the anons and newcomers are the smart ones and are right. HappyCamper 02:49, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - as above --HappyCamper 02:49, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As an article that has existed on Wikipedia since 27 August 2005, I do not see that there is any need to be speedy about this. It might be fun to see how many AOL IPs show up to defend this article. --JWSchmidt 02:57, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, a hoax. Alas, doesn't qualify for CSD. Owen× ☎ 02:58, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  Alas! You're right. This article should go through the full AfD voting period :-) --HappyCamper 03:00, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• BJADON. Seems like a WP:POINT violation/experiment by some of our enemies to test whether we were sharp enough. -- Natalinasmpf 03:15, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or BJADON per Natalinasmpf - FrancisTyers 04:00, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. --Daveb 04:07, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete before it hurts my Cerebral_cortex (where most of the article is plagarized from.) Ronabop 04:27, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom. Drmandrake 05:00, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. NeoJustin 05:21, December 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Emphatic delete. If anything shows up about neurology or neuroscience and you're uncertain, leave a note over in Wikipedia:WikiProject Neuroscience and at least I'll see it. Semiconscious 06:20, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Hoax, jibberish. --Wingsandsword 08:56, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete & BJADON ...before we succumb to contex driven neural responses... Scoo 11:04, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Quarl 11:10, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Jimbo Wales --Phroziac _. o º ^{O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!)} 13:15, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. "Bovasial contex" indeed...to add to User:Semiconscious's note, the folks at WP:MED, WP:CLINMED, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Preclinical medicine are always happy to take a look at dubious material as well. — Knowledge Seeker দ 00:01, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unless they meant the boandlukedukevasial Cortex. Dominick ^(TALK) 00:50, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The dog was from Conroe Texas and was known on the set as "Contex". --JWSchmidt 05:23, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep notable neurological phenominon, shows in dozens of google hits--152.163.100.135 06:15, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is not. Please provide an example of an external site referring to this phenonemon that does not use Wikipedia as its source. — Knowledge Seeker দ 06:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, at best OR and more likely junk. Stifle 02:00, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:V. — MATHWIZ2020 ^{TALK | CONTRIBS} 01:32, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.